Journal Entry

Most of us are familiar with Neutrons, the neutral particle that often resides in the nucleus of atoms. Those are the particles that the CosRay neutron detectors are investigating. They are liberated from nuclei during collisions with cosmic rays (see my previous journal for more information). But there is another particle detector in Antarctica, called the IceCube neutrino observatory, that studies a different particle altogether.

The IceCube building.The IceCube building. Photo by Katey Shirey.

As the name implies, IceCube neutrino observatory detects neutrinos. Neutrinos are particles that interact with matter only through the nuclear weak force and gravity. And since the mass of the neutrino is much smaller than that of the other known elementary particles, it is very hard to detect. In fact, if you want to have a 50% chance of stopping a neutrino then you would need a piece of lead a light-year long to get those odds! Basically, a neutrino needs to interact directly with the nucleus of an atom to be detected.

Science-y details about the detection:
When a fast moving particle enters a new material it can be going faster than light travels through that material (not faster than light in a vacuum … nothing is faster than that). This can cause the particle to emit light in a phenomena that is kind of like a sonic boom for light called Cherenkov radiation.

So when neutrinos hit the nucleus of an atom this can lead to the creation of light, which is comparatively easy to detect. The only problem is that direct collisions between neutrinos and nuclei are fairly rare. So you need to look at a LOT of nuclei that have a LOT of neutrinos going through them. That is one of the reasons that the IceCube neutrino observatory is so impressive. IceCube gets its name from the fact that is composed of a cubic kilometer of ice … now that is a lot of volume for collisions to happen. And there are no shortage of neutrinos. A quick estimate of the number of neutrinos coming from the sun would give a result of about 65 billion neutrinos, passing through just one square centimeter of area on earth, every second! So if you look hard enough, a few interactions are bound to happen.

A hole drilled for a string of IceCube light detectors.A hole drilled for a string of IceCube light detectors. Photo by Casey O'Hara

So why is it in Antarctica? It turns out that since ice is fairly dense, it makes a pretty good detector. And there is a lot of ice in Antarctica. Also the South Pole is so cold that the way the ice freezes makes it very clear, which makes detecting the light (Cherenkov radiation) easier. I probably won’t be making the trip from McMurdo to South Pole Station, but if you want some more information then follow my friend Kate, who will be working with IceCube very soon. It should be very cool because the neutrinos that they are studying can come from some pretty amazing places like black holes, other galaxies, and other high energy astronomical sources!

Comments

Michael Xi

Given that any particle fast enough that interacts with matter may cause Cherenkov radiation, how would the observatory distinguish between neutrino interactions, and say, high energy electrons (beta particles) from radioactive decay from the bedrock beneath the ice shelf? Or does the sheer mass of the ice shelf act as a natural radiation shield? Just curious. Thanks for the input and sorry if I missed anything that answers this question.

Eric Thuma

Great question. There are lots of things that address this. The detectors are optimized for the wavelengths produced by neutrino interactions. The thickness of the ice also affords a great deal of shielding. Multiple concurrent events also would favor a neutrino event over radioactive decay. That having been said there are false positive results but there are statistical methods to help weed those out. Also IceCube studies high energy Astronomical phenomena so sometimes when they are lucky they can get an optical telescope to find evidence of the event that caused the neutrinos. Also the direction matters, neutrinos can pass entirely through the Earth and are the only particle that can do so. So if the particle comes from the ground up rather than the sky down then you know it is a neutrino.

Michael Penn

Eric,
Nice job explaining how the detectors and the researchers know what is a real neutrino and what is a false positive.
Good work.
Mike in Pittsburgh

Maggie Kane

Great stuff, Eric! I flew over South Pole last week and may again in the next few days, collecting data with NASA's Operation IceBridge. I wish another PolarTREC teacher were there when we fly over again! It is VERY far from anywhere... think of central Kansas as the middle of the US as being like the South Pole, and McMurdo as being like Seattle, or Miami... with only ice and a mountains in between them!!! Its crazy big! Have fun getting ready for the greatest adventure of all time! Maggie

Eric Thuma

Thank's Maggie! I've been following your expedition. Great stuff.

Eric Thuma

Thank's Maggie! I've been following your expedition. Great stuff.

Armando Caussade

Awesome, Eric! Lots of useful information here. We are excited with your upcoming expedition to McMurdo and will be following you with much interest. Take care, and all the best!

Mike Penn

Jim Madsen is a busy guy! Isn't he the researcher for IceCube and this project (and probably a few others)? Thanks for the nice description. I look forward to your journals! - Mike Penn

Kate Miller

Thanks for the shout out, Eric! This is such a great overview of IceCube! Sounds like you're having an amazing time!

Eric Thuma

Jim sure is a busy guy. He seems to handle it very well though. Such a nice guy, he has been a blast to work with.