Journal Entry

Sea Ice on the Weddell Sea

Today we are traveling to the Weddell Sea to study the extent and thickness of the sea ice.

Plane RainbowWe can see ourselves as a shadow on the ice.

This is of special interest to Nathan Katz, our mission scientist who started studying sea ice with his advisor in graduate school. While their original work was focused on satellite mapping the moons of Jupiter, and their other project was ICESat, the satellites that can map sea ice. ICESat-1 was designed to study the ice thickness and extent of polar ice, but stopped working in 2009. Since then, NASA has used Operation IceBridge instruments, and the high resolution has revealed great detail. With ICESat-2’s scheduled launch in the next year or so, we will continue to collect data from the DC-8, and do more than just "bridge" the gap.

NathanKProject Scientists Dr. Nathan Kurtz. ice2So many kinds of ice.

Ultimately, today's mission should show Nathan and his team the thickness of sea ice and how it's changing in the long term. Nathan expects to see sea ice on the east and west sides of the peninsula today, where the team has two lines of data. He thinks these readings will be representative of other parts of the waters surrounding Antarctica, making this data a very important tool.

creaks The ice is so beautiful!

Why Are We Flying Here?

This path across the Weddell Sea is the last of the high priority baseline missions this year. Because the DC-8 has so many amazing instruments on board, Nathan hopes that the team can calculate the mass of the sea ice, including some large pressure ridges. The compaction of snow can become very dense and deformed, and high definition imagery will help reveal how much ice volume there is in the pressure ridges and keels (the ridges below the water). These features not only contain very dense ice, but they also dictate how the pieces of ice move under the force of wind and waves. The texture of the sea ice, including the ridges and keels, allow the ice to move and may help explain why we are seeing an increase in sea ice around Antarctica. If the ice is simply moving off shore because it is more susceptible to being moved by wind, that will be good for scientists to know. If anything were to surprise Nathan today, it would be the reappearance of a polynya (open water in the middle of the frozen sea) that was present in the central Weddell Sea decades ago. He suspects that the ice may have opened a small area in that location, but if it opened up a large area, it it would be very surprising.

What Changes Are The Scientists Seeing?

John Sonntag, Airborne Topographic Mapping scientists, shared images with me of ice extent on the western side of peninsula this year vs. last year. The bottom line: ice is much less extensive this year. This can be because of natural variability caused by conditions such as La Nina, or perhaps from stronger westerly winds pushing the ice out and away from the land. We can speculate, he said, but we don't really know. Satellites have only been around for 50 years, so our record is very short. This makes the study of sea ice an area of less certainty than land ice.

datastripeA snippet of data from today's flight.

We were treated to a visual feast today. We saw 1 km long ice shelves and icebergs standing 150-180' tall, lots of seals lounging on ice floes and a mesmerizing tapestry of ice and water. We flew over the 200' high Brunt Ice Shelf, flying at 700', and we startled a flock of penguins who flurried along the ice as we approached. Crossing and recrossing the Weddell Sea, which is about the size of Texas, made me reflect on Captain Earnest Shackleton's journey through this area, the crew’s efforts to get unlocked from the ice and the harsh conditions they endured living out here.

ice 4Patterns and shadows. crevasses The texture of the ice is astonishing.

Comments

Lillian Allen …

L.A. & J.S. - how do gravimeters works?What can we do to lessen the melting of ice in Antarctica?

Jimmy M

Hey Maggie, with all the packed down snow on top of the ice, is it hard for the instruments to to read just the ice to figure out how much sea ice is actually there?

Jimmy M

Hey Maggie, with all the packed down snow on top of the ice, is it hard for the instruments to to read just the ice to figure out how much sea ice is actually there?

Erik K

Hey Maggie hope your having fun. My question is about you guys showing Nathan the long term ice changes. The question is how will you show him how the ice has changed and in what way has it changed?

Rachel H

If humans weren't around, how much slower would the sea ice be melting?

Maggie Kane

Hi L and J!The basic ability (its super power) that the gravimeter has is its able to detect the mass of material below itself. It is an inert navigation system so it knows exactly where it is in space and time, and then by detecting acceleration left right, up and down of the aircraft, it can detect horizontal, rotational, and vertical motion. It then subtracts the aircraft motion (which it knows by very accurate GPS information) and the only difference left is gravity! It is a $700,000 machine that is one of the high precision instruments I’ve ever sat next to.

What can we do to lessen the melting of the ice in Antarctica?
This is a big question and one I’m glad you are asking. There is a lot of complexity to this ice, water, atmosphere interface but what we do know is that many of the glaciers are loosing mass very fast right now. Based on this, lots of temperature data from air and water, and many other data points, scientists think that if we were able to reduce gasses that contribute to rise (chiefly CO2 and Methane) we could begin to slow down the warming trends we are seeing. But it is really complex! I think to lessen these gases, we could work toward developing alternative fuels and do what we can to limit our use of Carbon based things that we burn. I also would say, study science, math or engineering to help solve the problem, but I know that’s not for everyone!

Maggie Kane

Hi Jimmy, fantastic question! As it turns out, we have different instruments for each layer of the ice. The top layer is measured by the ATM (Airborne Topographic Mapper) lasers, so this shows exactly where the surface of the snow is. Then there is the snow radar that is a shallow, radar but has super high resolution. This shows layers within the top 20 m of the snow in really fine detail, but doesn’t go deeper than that. Then the deeper radar called MCORDS (multi-channel depth sounding radar) penetrates down all the way through the ice. In Greenland, they use an “Accumulation Radar” that reads at a lower resolution but can kind of do it all. Also, the Gravimeter “reads” the bedrock below the ice to give us a clear and detailed profile. So, to get back to your question, we can tease apart what is snow and what is ice or rock with these different instruments. With that said, the snow is turning into ice as it gets buried by fresher snow and compacts, so some ice, called firn, is un-melted snow from at least a year ago, but not ice yet. When we specifically think about sea ice, we see that the snow is on the ice floe, so as far as surface area goes, it is one and the same. For thickness, the instruments described above would allow us to see the snow and ice interface well.